Technical skills screening software helps companies evaluate whether candidates can actually do the work required for a role. The category started largely with coding tests, but has expanded considerably. Products now range from traditional assessment libraries and live coding environments to job simulations, AI interviews, resume screening, and fully automated hiring workflows.

That makes comparing them surprisingly difficult. Two products listed in the same category can solve very different problems, target different stages of the hiring process, and cost an order of magnitude apart.

Criteria for inclusion

We started with companies listed in G2’s Technical Skills Screening category, but appearing on G2 wasn’t enough. To keep the comparison current, we only included products that still have an active offering and have received at least one G2 review dated in 2026.

We also excluded products that have been discontinued or acquired and no longer operate as independent offerings. The goal isn’t to create the longest possible list. It’s to compare products that companies are actively evaluating and customers are actively using today.

How we compared each product

Most comparison pages make assessment platforms look more similar than they actually are. Feature lists become a collection of checkmarks, while pricing is reduced to “contact sales.”

We structured each profile around the questions a buyer would actually need answered. How much does it cost to assess 300 candidates? Is SSO included or hidden behind an enterprise contract? What does ATS integration cost? Can you run take-home tests or live interviews? Does the product support AI phone screening, webcam proctoring, or a real VS Code environment with agentic coding?

We also include notable strengths and limitations from customer feedback. This makes it easier to distinguish between a feature that technically exists and a product that is actually good at delivering it.

Which platforms stand out?

For most established, the strongest three are Mercer | Mettl, HackerRank, and TestGorilla when considering customer footprint, G2 review volume, and company size together. Mercer | Mettl says it works with 6,000+ corporate customers and 700+ educational institutions, has more than 500 G2 reviews across its products, and has roughly 500 employees. HackerRank is used by 2,600+ companies and has more than 1,000 G2 reviews. TestGorilla is used by thousands of organizations, has nearly 1,450 G2 reviews, and has grown to a few hundred employees despite launching much more recently in 2020.

For feature completeness, the strongest three are Coderbyte, Glider AI, and WeCP. Coderbyte is the only product we reviewed that checks every capability we tracked: resume grading, AI phone screening, take-home tests, live interviews, personality tests, VS Code with agentic coding, webcam proctoring, SOC 2 compliance, SSO, and ATS integrations. Glider AI and WeCP cover nearly the entire evaluation funnel but lack the same agentic development environment.

For 50 candidates per year, the absolute lowest-cost options are ASTRNT, Equip, and Evalart. ASTRNT's free allowance covers as many as 60 candidates annually, a simple Equip workflow can cost roughly $50, and Evalart is around $190 for 50 candidates. If you need something substantially more feature-complete, the lowest-cost options from that group are Coderbyte at $1,799/year, followed by WeCP at an estimated $2,000–$6,000/year and Glider AI at roughly $5,000–$15,000/year. The difference is that these products can cover considerably more of the hiring process rather than just administering an assessment.

At 300 candidates per year, Equip, TestTrick, and SkillRobo have the lowest published or estimable costs at roughly $300, $420, and $490 per year, respectively. They're compelling if basic assessments are the primary requirement. For buyers who need a more complete evaluation stack, Coderbyte is again the lowest-cost option at $1,799/year with unlimited candidates, followed by WeCP at roughly $2,000–$6,000/year and Glider AI at roughly $5,000–$15,000/year based on their custom pricing.

For unique or innovative features, Coderbyte, Karat, and Sapia.ai stand out for very different reasons. Coderbyte combines the full evaluation funnel with a VS Code environment where candidates can work with agentic AI. Karat effectively lets companies outsource technical interviewing to professional interviewers rather than just buying assessment software. Sapia.ai goes in the opposite direction of traditional testing, using conversational AI to evaluate behavioral and job-fit signals at high volume.

There isn't one obvious winner across every dimension. The category now spans inexpensive testing utilities, full evaluation suites, AI interviewers, realistic developer environments, and managed interviewing services. The right comparison therefore depends as much on what you need to evaluate as how many candidates you need to evaluate.

—

HackerRank

Website: hackerrank.com
Company size: 101+
G2 reviews: 401+
Notable clients: IBM, Atlassian, LinkedIn, Stripe, Booking.com

Trial: Free trial available. No credit card is required. HackerRank does not clearly publish the trial duration; trial usage is limited compared with a paid account.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Approximately $4,490/year. This corresponds to HackerRank’s self-serve tier with 300 annual assessment attempts.

Minimum cost for SSO: More than $4,490/year; exact price not disclosed. SSO requires enterprise pricing.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Approximately $4,490+/year, depending on the integration and plan.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: No

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: Yes

• Personality tests: No

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: Yes

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: HackerRank has one of the deepest technical assessment ecosystems in the category, with coding challenges, database tasks, project-based assessments, collaborative interviews, automated scoring, plagiarism detection, and extensive integrity controls. Its proctoring can monitor webcams, multiple monitors, application switching, and other suspicious behavior.

Notable limitations: Customers say assessment administration can become cumbersome, permissions and navigation can be confusing, and modifying library questions is less flexible than expected. Question exposure is another concern for such a widely used library, while subscription limits can make the platform expensive for smaller or high-volume teams.

—

TestGorilla

Website: testgorilla.com
Company size: 101+
G2 reviews: 401+
Notable clients: Sony, PepsiCo, Bain & Company, H&M, Revolut

Trial: No time limit. TestGorilla offers an ongoing free plan rather than a conventional trial. It includes 10 credits per month, five essential skills tests, resume scoring, qualifying questions, limited video questions and limited AI interview usage. No credit card is required.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Approximately $1,704–$4,800+/year. Core costs $1,704/year and includes 250 credits. Additional usage is credit-based, so the exact cost of 300 candidates depends on whether candidates complete skills tests, video questions, AI interviews, or other credit-consuming activities.

Minimum cost for SSO: $0/year for Microsoft SSO, which is available even on the free plan.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: $4,800/year.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: Yes

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: No

• Personality tests: Yes

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: Yes

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: TestGorilla is much broader than a traditional coding-test platform. It combines resume grading with 350+ technical, cognitive, situational, language, personality, and culture tests, plus custom coding challenges, AI interviews, sourcing, and candidate behavior monitoring.

Notable limitations: Customers say some questions can feel abstract or insufficiently relevant to the actual job, while customization can be restrictive for specialized roles. Pricing also becomes difficult to predict because different parts of an evaluation consume different numbers of credits.

—

Testlify

Website: testlify.com
Company size: 101+
G2 reviews: 401+
Notable clients: Airtel, Navan, Capsule, Ditto, Solvay

Trial: 7 days. No credit card is required. The trial provides premium feature access but is limited to 10 candidate invites. Testlify allows eligible accounts to extend it another seven days at no charge.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Approximately $5,868/year using the public Starter pricing: $1,668 for 100 credits plus 200 additional credits at $21 each. The actual cost may be lower under higher-volume or custom credit pricing.

Minimum cost for SSO: More than $1,668/year; exact add-on price not disclosed. SAML SSO is an add-on on Standard and included with custom pricing.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: $4,056/year. That is the $1,668 annual Starter subscription plus the $2,388 annual integration add-on.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: Yes

• AI phone screening: Yes

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: No

• Personality tests: Yes

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: Yes

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: Testlify combines a very large assessment library with AI video, audio, and phone interviews, resume scoring, job simulations, coding tasks, personality testing, and an unusually extensive proctoring suite. Its current library lists 3,500+ tests and 180,000+ validated questions.

Notable limitations: Customers say customization and reporting can still feel limited for more specialized use cases, and some find the interface less intuitive than expected. The credit system also becomes relatively expensive at higher candidate volumes when compared with unlimited-use products.

—

Codility

Website: codility.com
Company size: 101+
G2 reviews: 401+
Notable clients: Barclays, BMW, Deutsche Bank, GitHub, Samsung

Trial: Free trial available; duration not publicly specified. Trials are sales-assisted and scoped around the roles, expected volume, and products the buyer wants to evaluate rather than being a self-serve fixed trial.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: $6,000/year. Scale includes 300 annual credits, but usage is capped at 25 per month.

Minimum cost for SSO: More than $6,000/year; exact price not disclosed. SSO and SAML require the Custom plan.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: More than $6,000/year; exact price not disclosed. Enterprise integrations require the Custom plan.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: No

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: Yes

• Personality tests: No

• VS Code with agentic coding: Yes

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: Yes

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: Codility has moved well beyond traditional algorithm challenges. Its enterprise offering includes a VS Code assessment environment, databases and other sidecar services, an agentic AI copilot with reviewable activity, Claude Code CLI, live technical interviews, assessment science, ID verification, and premium video proctoring.

Notable limitations: Customers say question difficulty can be inconsistent for senior roles and some assessments can still feel more constrained than actual engineering work. The pricing structure is also restrictive for irregular hiring because the $6,000 plan limits use to 25 credits per month instead of making all 300 annual credits freely available.

—

Coderbyte

Website: coderbyte.com
Company size: 1–10
G2 reviews: 401+
Notable clients: Adobe, Samsung, Pfizer, BNY Mellon, US Military

Trial: 14 days. No charge until the trial ends. An organization generally cannot repeatedly restart trials after someone from that organization has already canceled one.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: $1,799/year. The annual plan includes unlimited candidates.

Minimum cost for SSO: $3,298/year. The $1,799 annual plan plus the $1,499 SSO + SCIM add-on.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: $3,298/year. The $1,799 annual plan plus the $1,499 API and ATS integration add-on.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: Yes

• AI phone screening: Yes

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: Yes

• Personality tests: Yes

• VS Code with agentic coding: Yes

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: Yes

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: Coderbyte covers the broadest span of the hiring funnel among these products: resume grading, agentic phone screens, assessments, take-home projects, live interviews, personality tests, and webcam proctoring. Candidates can also use integrated AI chat and agent mode inside technical interviews and projects, allowing employers to evaluate AI-assisted development rather than simply block it.

Notable limitations: Customers say the challenge library could be broader in some specialized areas and reporting and administration could offer more flexibility. Several enterprise-oriented capabilities—including SSO, integrations, personality testing, and premium proctoring—are also separate add-ons.

—

HackerEarth Assessments

Website: hackerearth.com
Company size: 101+
G2 reviews: 401+
Notable clients: Walmart, Amazon, Barclays, GE, Siemens

Trial: Free trial available; duration and invite limit are not clearly disclosed publicly.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: $4,788/year. HackerEarth’s published Scale pricing is $399/month for 25 assessments per month, which equals 300 per year.

Minimum cost for SSO: Not publicly disclosed.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Not publicly disclosed.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: No

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: Yes

• Personality tests: No

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: No

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: HackerEarth combines a mature technical assessment platform with FaceCode live interviewing, full-stack assessments, detailed integrity reporting, plagiarism detection, audio monitoring, and webcam proctoring. Its August 2026 release also extended full-stack assessments directly into FaceCode.

Notable limitations: Customers say time limits can be overly strict, some questions lack enough detail or clarity, and customization and reporting could be stronger. The current pricing also allocates the 300-candidate volume monthly rather than as a flexible annual pool.

—

VidCruiter

Website: vidcruiter.com
Company size: 101+
G2 reviews: 101–400
Notable clients: Bridgestone, Pepsi, Unum, US Foods, RaceTrac

Trial: No public self-serve trial. VidCruiter directs prospective customers to request a demo and uses a sales-led evaluation process.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Custom pricing. There is not enough public candidate-volume pricing to produce a defensible 300-invite estimate; VidCruiter says enterprise pricing varies by volume and modules.

Minimum cost for SSO: Custom pricing; not publicly disclosed.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Custom pricing; not publicly disclosed.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: No

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: Yes

• Personality tests: No

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: Yes

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: VidCruiter is much more interview-centric than the coding platforms. It combines pre-recorded and live interviews with structured rubrics, scheduling, skills testing, reference checks, AI-assisted scoring, fraud detection, and dedicated video proctoring. It also has unusually strong enterprise compliance and 24/7 candidate support.

Notable limitations: Customers say the administrator experience can feel manual and unintuitive when changing questions or workflows. The product is also aimed primarily at mid-market and enterprise buyers, with custom pricing and a heavier implementation process than self-serve assessment tools.

—

eSkill

Website: eskill.com
Company size: 101+
G2 reviews: 101–400
Notable clients: Costco, Deloitte, Garmin, GE Vernova, World Health Organization

Trial: No fixed self-serve trial. eSkill offers a test during a live demo and can arrange pilot programs before an annual commitment; the duration and usage limits of pilots are not publicly standardized.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Approximately $3,600/year using the publicly listed small-business rate of $1,200 per 100 assessments. eSkill recommends buyers expecting more than 200 annual assessments move to a higher-volume subscription, so an actual quote may differ.

Minimum cost for SSO: Not publicly disclosed.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Not publicly disclosed. Higher subscription tiers support systems integration, but the minimum current subscription price is not published.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: No

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: No

• Personality tests: Yes

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: No

• SSO: No

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: eSkill differentiates itself through breadth rather than developer-specific tooling. Its library contains more than 70,000 questions across 600+ subjects, including technical skills, office software simulations, cognitive tests, and behavioral assessments. Its AI-powered proctoring records webcam video, microphone audio, and the candidate’s screen while generating suspicious-activity signals for human review.

Notable limitations: Customers say usage can be difficult to track, some reporting requires too much work to extract, and the custom test builder can become cumbersome. One recent customer also noted limitations when testing ATS integrations across multiple live environments.

—

SkillPanel

Website: skillpanel.com
Company size: 11–100
G2 reviews: 101–400
Notable clients: IKEA, Orange, Criteo, Ada Health, DB1 Group

Trial: Free trial available; duration and usage limits are not publicly stated. SkillPanel’s terms say the company can define or modify the trial period and may require billing information.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Not directly comparable. Current public pricing starts at $1 per employee/month, because SkillPanel has repositioned around workforce skills intelligence rather than pricing primarily by candidate invites. Candidate-assessment volume pricing is not broken out publicly.

Minimum cost for SSO: Not publicly disclosed.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Not publicly disclosed.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: No

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: Yes

• Personality tests: No

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: No

• SOC 2 compliance: No

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: SkillPanel is increasingly an adjacent competitor rather than a pure technical-screening product. Its standout capability is a dynamic skills map that combines employee, manager, and expert validation to identify skill levels and gaps across an organization, while retaining technical testing and live code-pairing capabilities.

Notable limitations: Customers say exports and reporting could provide more detail, while some workflows and integrations still need refinement. Its current workforce-focused pricing also makes it unusually difficult to compare directly with candidate-based technical assessment platforms.

—

CoderPad

Website: coderpad.io
Company size: 11–100
G2 reviews: 401+
Notable clients: CarGurus, BigCommerce, Netskope, Spotify, LinkedIn

Trial: 14 days. No credit card is required and CoderPad describes the trial as providing unlimited product access during the trial period. A person or organization cannot create repeated accounts merely to obtain additional trial periods.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: $4,800/year. Team includes 360 tests or interviews annually. Both tests and interviews consume the same quota.

Minimum cost for SSO: More than $4,800/year; exact price not disclosed. SAML SSO + SCIM require Custom.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: More than $4,800/year; exact price not disclosed. ATS and API integrations require Custom.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: No

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: Yes

• Personality tests: No

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: Yes

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: CoderPad is particularly strong for collaborative technical interviews. It combines a shared IDE, executable code, debugging, video calling, projects, whiteboarding, code playback, rubrics, AI-assisted evaluation, and automated technical screening.

Notable limitations: Customers say the environment can feel limited compared with a full local IDE, especially for complex projects and advanced debugging. Others mention occasional latency, minimal analytics, missing customization, and pricing that can feel high for teams conducting relatively few interviews.

—

CodeSignal

Website: codesignal.com
Company size: 101+
G2 reviews: 401+
Notable clients: Google, Dropbox, Capital One, Netflix, Meta

Trial: No conventional employer trial is currently advertised. CodeSignal lets individuals start its learning product for free, but its hiring product uses paid self-serve plans rather than a time-limited free trial.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Approximately $5,748/year. Grow costs $479/month billed annually and includes 420 credits. One credit is consumed when a candidate starts an assessment, AI interview, or live interview.

Minimum cost for SSO: More than $5,748/year; exact price not disclosed. SSO, SCIM, JIT, and audit logs require the custom Pro plan.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: $5,748/year. Basic ATS integrations are included with Grow; enterprise integrations require Pro.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: No

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: Yes

• Personality tests: Yes

• VS Code with agentic coding: Yes

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: Yes

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: CodeSignal has evolved from a coding-assessment product into a broader AI-native skills platform. It combines technical and nontechnical assessments, live interviews, AI interviewers, advanced coding environments, behavioral assessments, AI proctoring, and ID verification. Its credits are interchangeable between assessments and interviews rather than being locked to one evaluation format.

Notable limitations: Customers say question difficulty can vary substantially and some challenges become repetitive. Because CodeSignal is widely used, candidates can also sometimes find discussions or solutions to assessment problems online. G2 currently has more than 1,400 reviews, including reviews from 2026.

—

Andela

Website: andela.com
Company size: 101+
G2 reviews: 101–400
Notable clients: GitHub, Mastercard, ViacomCBS, Mindshare

Trial: No public self-serve trial. Andela is primarily a managed talent platform, so employers engage with its sales/talent team rather than opening a conventional assessment trial.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Not directly comparable. Andela does not sell candidate assessment invites as a standalone self-serve product with public per-candidate pricing.

Minimum cost for SSO: Not publicly disclosed.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Not publicly disclosed.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: Yes

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: Yes

• Personality tests: No

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: No

• SOC 2 compliance: Yes

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: Andela is the outlier in this category because assessment is only one component of a much larger talent marketplace. Its Talent Cloud sources, qualifies, matches, hires, manages, and pays technical talent. Its newer technical assessment uses practical work simulations such as debugging, code review, system design, and feature development rather than abstract coding puzzles.

Notable limitations: Customers say matching with suitable projects or talent can take longer than expected, and the platform is difficult to compare with standalone assessment products because assessment is bundled into a broader talent service.

—

iMocha

Website: imocha.io
Company size: 101+
G2 reviews: 101–400
Notable clients: Fujitsu, Ericsson, Capgemini, Deloitte, Schneider Electric

Trial: Free trial available. The exact duration and candidate allowance are not consistently disclosed publicly, so buyers may need to engage with iMocha before evaluating the full platform.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Approximately $3,000–$8,000/year. iMocha uses quote-based packages and assessment volume influences the price, so there is no reliable public self-serve price for exactly 300 candidates.

Minimum cost for SSO: Custom pricing; exact price not disclosed.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Custom pricing; exact price not disclosed.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: Yes

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: Yes

• Personality tests: Yes

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: Yes

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: iMocha has one of the broader skills libraries in the category and spans both external hiring and internal workforce intelligence. It supports customizable technical and nontechnical assessments, coding tests, AI-powered proctoring, webcam monitoring, plagiarism detection, analytics, and skills intelligence.

Notable limitations: Customers say creating and editing assessments can be unintuitive, particularly for new administrators. Navigation becomes cumbersome with larger tests, while reporting and bulk report downloads could be more flexible.

—

Criteria

Website: criteriacorp.com
Company size: 101+
G2 reviews: 101–400
Notable clients: Domino’s, American Red Cross, Warby Parker, Los Angeles Dodgers, Blue Cross Blue Shield

Trial: Free trial available. Criteria asks prospective customers to request the trial rather than publishing a fixed self-serve duration or candidate allowance.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Approximately $1,500–$5,000/year. Pricing is quote-based and depends on hiring volume and the assessment products included.

Minimum cost for SSO: Custom pricing; exact price not disclosed.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Custom pricing; exact price not disclosed.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: No

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: Yes

• Personality tests: Yes

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: No

• SOC 2 compliance: Yes

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: Criteria is built more around psychometric science than technical interviewing. It combines cognitive aptitude, personality, emotional intelligence, risk, skills, and structured interviewing tools. This makes it particularly relevant when technical ability is only one dimension of what an employer wants to measure.

Notable limitations: Customers say standardized questionnaires do not always map cleanly to specialized roles, reporting can be difficult to use, and some users want more customization. G2 has multiple verified 2026 reviews making similar points about the usefulness of standardized testing and integrations.

—

Codeaid

Website: codeaid.io
Company size: 11–100
G2 reviews: 11–100
Notable clients: Public customer references are limited

Trial: 14 days. The current Team plan explicitly includes a 14-day free trial.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Approximately $1,500–$2,500/year. Team costs $99/month annually and includes 20 candidate invites per month, or 240 annually. Additional candidate credit packs can be purchased, but current pack prices are not publicly exposed, so 300 candidates requires an estimate.

Minimum cost for SSO: Not publicly disclosed.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Approximately $1,188/year. The Team plan includes integrations.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: No

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: Yes

• Personality tests: No

• VS Code with agentic coding: Yes

• Webcam proctoring: No

• SOC 2 compliance: No

• SSO: No

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: Codeaid has repositioned itself around evaluating AI engineers and AI-assisted development. Its original differentiator was long, realistic Git-based projects rather than short algorithm questions; the current product puts more emphasis on evaluating how engineers work with modern AI development workflows.

Notable limitations: Customers like the simplicity and realistic assessments but say the test library could be broader. Its smaller footprint also means fewer enterprise security, administration, and ecosystem capabilities than the largest platforms.

—

Canditech

Website: canditech.io
Company size: 11–100
G2 reviews: 11–100
Notable clients: monday.com, Wix, EY, Fiverr, Deloitte

Trial: 14 days. No credit card is required. Canditech says the trial is intended to let an employer run a real position through the platform.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Approximately $2,400–$7,200/year. Canditech prices by annual candidate volume. Public pricing at 100 candidates starts at $150/month for Team and $200/month for Pro; the exact 300-candidate price changes with volume.

Minimum cost for SSO: Custom pricing; exact price not disclosed.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Approximately $2,400+/year, with final cost depending on candidate volume. ATS integration begins with Pro.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: Yes

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: No

• Personality tests: Yes

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: Yes

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: Canditech focuses heavily on realistic job simulations and customizable assessments. Employers can combine technical questions, video, spreadsheets, files, open-ended responses, personality measures, and AI-generated content. Its approach to AI is also relatively pragmatic: employers can allow ChatGPT or Google Search and review what candidates did rather than simply blocking those tools.

Notable limitations: Customers say the technical library and automated coding evaluation are less mature than dedicated developer-assessment platforms. One 2026 reviewer specifically wanted more prebuilt technical questions and deeper automated scoring, while another noted the absence of a live coding interview environment.

—

Equip

Website: equip.co
Company size: 11–100
G2 reviews: 401+
Notable clients: Public enterprise customer references are limited

Trial: No time limit. New teams receive 10 free credits with no credit card required. Those credits can be used for assessments or AI interviews whenever the employer wants.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Approximately $300–$900/year, depending on the workflow. One skills test costs $1 per candidate, a one-way AI interview costs another $1, and conversational AI interviews cost $2–$3. Resume screening itself is free.

Minimum cost for SSO: Not publicly disclosed.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: $0 for Equip's built-in ATS; approximately $90/month for API access. Premium includes API access for external workflows.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: Yes

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: No

• Personality tests: Yes

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: No

• SSO: No

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: Equip is unusually inexpensive and transparent. Resume parsing, AI resume ranking, job posts, and its ATS are free; employers then pay per candidate for assessments and AI interviews. It supports coding, aptitude, communication, psychometric, SQL, Excel, CSS, typing, custom assessments, and AI proctoring.

Notable limitations: Customers say advanced functionality and customization can feel limited, and some report occasional performance or loading issues. The simplicity that makes Equip inexpensive also means it lacks some enterprise functionality found in much more expensive platforms.

—

Mercer Mettl Assessments

Website: mettl.com
Company size: 101+
G2 reviews: 401+
Notable clients: Mercer, Microsoft, Amazon, Accenture, Dell

Trial: Free access is available, but no standardized trial duration or candidate allowance is publicly stated. Pricing and evaluation are configured around the organization’s requirements.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Approximately $3,000–$8,000/year. Mercer Mettl uses customized and pay-as-you-go packages, so the exact cost depends on the assessment type, proctoring, simulations, and volume.

Minimum cost for SSO: Custom pricing; exact price not disclosed.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Custom pricing; exact price not disclosed.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: No

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: Yes

• Personality tests: Yes

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: Yes

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: Mercer Mettl is one of the broadest assessment vendors in the category, spanning technical skills, cognitive ability, personality, simulations, coding, remote examinations, and high-security proctoring. It is particularly strong when an organization needs both hiring assessments and large-scale testing or certification infrastructure.

Notable limitations: Customers say pricing can be high for smaller teams, advanced functionality has a learning curve, custom reports could be more flexible, and performance can occasionally suffer under load. Those criticisms appear directly in a 2026 G2 review.

—

Adaface

Website: adaface.com
Company size: 11–100
G2 reviews: 11–100
Notable clients: Siemens, PayPal, Amazon, Hitachi, Unilever

Trial: No conventional free trial is currently advertised on the public pricing page. Buyers can purchase the smallest annual package rather than entering a fixed-duration trial.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Approximately $3,000/year. Scale includes 500 credits. Candidate invitations consume one credit each, while accessing a ready-made assessment costs five credits and creating a custom assessment costs ten.

Minimum cost for SSO: Not publicly disclosed.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Approximately $3,000/year or less depending on the required integration. Exact feature gating is not sufficiently clear on the current public pricing page to give a more precise minimum.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: No

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: No

• Personality tests: Yes

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: Yes

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: Adaface emphasizes conversational, job-relevant assessments rather than traditional test-taking. Its library spans programming, AI, data science, cloud, aptitude, psychometric, finance, language, and other business skills, with more than 500 ready-made assessments currently included in its credit model.

Notable limitations: Customers say custom assessments can take longer to configure, and some questions need clearer explanations or additional context. A 2026 reviewer liked the practical, lower-stress format but still identified areas where the assessment experience could be improved.

—

DevSkiller

Website: devskiller.com
Company size: 11–100
G2 reviews: 101–400
Notable clients: Deloitte, PayPal, Orange, Accenture, Volkswagen

Trial: Free trial available. DevSkiller has historically offered a short product trial, but its current public materials do not consistently expose a fixed duration and candidate limit.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Approximately $3,000–$8,000/year. Current assessment pricing is quote-based and varies by candidate volume and functionality.

Minimum cost for SSO: Custom pricing; exact price not disclosed.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Custom pricing; exact price not disclosed.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: No

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: Yes

• Personality tests: No

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: Yes

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: DevSkiller’s defining idea is RealLifeTesting: candidates work on larger programming tasks designed to resemble actual development work rather than solving isolated algorithm questions. The platform supports coding projects, automated scoring, technical screening, live technical interviewing, and skills management.

Notable limitations: Customers have historically cited pricing, administration, and the effort required to customize more sophisticated assessments. The product has also expanded significantly into skills management, making its positioning less focused on technical candidate screening than it once was.

—

Vervoe

Website: vervoe.com
Company size: 11–100
G2 reviews: 11–100
Notable clients: Lumen Technologies, OneMain Financial, Kroll, Subaru, Australia Post

Trial: Free trial available. Vervoe allows one assessment during the trial and lets you view results from up to 50 responding candidates. You can send more invitations, but responses beyond the first 50 remain locked until upgrading. The current public materials don't clearly state the trial duration.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Approximately $3,000–$8,000/year. Vervoe has moved to custom enterprise pricing, so there is no longer a public candidate-volume price from which to calculate exactly 300 assessments.

Minimum cost for SSO: Custom pricing; likely within the same $3,000–$8,000+ annual range. SSO is part of Vervoe's enterprise offering.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Custom pricing; likely $3,000–$8,000+/year. Vervoe supports enterprise integration pathways and API-based workflows, but does not publish a minimum price.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: No

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: No

• Personality tests: Yes

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: No

• SOC 2 compliance: Yes

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: Vervoe is heavily focused on immersive, role-specific work samples rather than generic multiple-choice testing. Its AI grading learns how employers evaluate responses and automatically ranks candidates, while supporting coding, presentations, spreadsheets, video, and other task-based question types.

Notable limitations: Customers say the AI scoring has improved but can still be more accurate, some job templates are missing, and occasional candidate-side technical problems occur. Some teams also want faster support and more customization. A current G2 review was updated in February 2026.

—

HireVue

Website: hirevue.com
Company size: 101+
G2 reviews: 101–400
Notable clients: Delta Air Lines, T-Mobile, BP, Grant Thornton, Cathay Pacific

Trial: No public self-serve trial. HireVue uses a demo and sales-led evaluation process rather than allowing employers to create a conventional free trial account.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Approximately $35,000+/year. HireVue publicly lists its Essentials offering as starting around $35,000 and primarily targets larger organizations.

Minimum cost for SSO: Approximately $35,000+/year. Exact packaging isn't publicly broken out.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Approximately $35,000+/year. HireVue supports deep integrations with major recruiting systems but does not publish feature-specific minimum pricing.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: No

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: Yes

• Personality tests: Yes

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: Yes

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: HireVue is strongest in structured interviewing and high-volume enterprise hiring. It combines on-demand and live video interviews, skills assessments, Virtual Job Tryouts, scheduling, structured interview guides, workflow automation, and enterprise-grade compliance. It is SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, and FedRAMP certified.

Notable limitations: Customers say one-way video interviews can feel impersonal, particularly for candidates who perform better with real-time interaction. Others report occasional browser issues and a relatively heavy implementation and purchasing process. G2 includes multiple reviews from 2026.

—

Glider AI

Website: glider.ai
Company size: 101+
G2 reviews: 101–400
Notable clients: Uber, Samsung, PwC, Intuit, Expedia

Trial: Free trial available. The assessment trial provides access to assessments, AI-enabled proctoring, reporting, configurable templates, real-world tasks, and integrations. Glider does not clearly publish a fixed duration or candidate allowance.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Approximately $5,000–$15,000/year. Glider uses custom pricing, and the actual cost depends on assessment volume and which screening/interview modules are included.

Minimum cost for SSO: Custom pricing; approximately $5,000–$15,000+/year.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Custom pricing; approximately $5,000–$15,000+/year.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: Yes

• AI phone screening: Yes

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: Yes

• Personality tests: Yes

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: Yes

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: Glider AI is unusually broad, spanning AI screening, skills validation, technical and nontechnical assessments, live interviewing, candidate identity verification, learning, and employee skills development. Its ScreenBot can conduct voice-based screening, while its proctoring includes continuous webcam monitoring and fraud detection.

Notable limitations: Customers generally like the screening and proctoring capabilities but say navigation and the interface could be improved. Because so much of the offering is modular and enterprise-oriented, pricing is also difficult to compare without engaging sales. G2 lists a January 2026 review specifically praising its real-world assessments and anti-cheating controls.

—

TestTrick

Website: testtrick.com
Company size: 11–100
G2 reviews: 11–100
Notable clients: Africa Code Academy, Trillium Information Security, Horizon Technologies, CSI Engineering, Mple.AI

Trial: 7 days. No credit card is required. TestTrick says the trial provides access to all paid features, including assessments, candidate management, reporting, proctoring, and integrations.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: $420/year. Starter includes 600 annual credits, enough for at least 300 completed assessments under its basic credit model.

Minimum cost for SSO: Not publicly disclosed. Enterprise requirements may require custom pricing.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: $420/year. TestTrick says all paid plans include ATS integrations.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: No

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: No

• Personality tests: Yes

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: No

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: TestTrick's standout differentiator is price. Its entry plan includes the full assessment library, coding challenges, personality and cognitive testing, one-way video interviews, AI proctoring, screen recording, browser lockdown, branding, and integrations rather than feature-gating them into higher tiers.

Notable limitations: Customers want more specialized tests in areas such as databases, tax, and other niche subjects. One 2026 reviewer also called out difficulty resending the same assessment to a candidate and wanted stronger integration behavior. Its AI analysis is still relatively limited compared with more AI-heavy platforms.

—

HireQuotient

Website: hirequotient.com
Company size: 11–100
G2 reviews: 101–400
Notable clients: Boston Consulting Group, Checkmarx, Arthur D. Little, Alton Lane, YCharts

Trial: 14 days for its current Paylocity-connected offering. HireQuotient otherwise tends to use demos and sales-led pilots depending on the product being evaluated.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Approximately $3,000/year using its published EasyAssess volume pricing. Its historical Growth tier is $500 for 50 candidates, while the higher tier supports 100 candidates for $1,000, so 300 assessments works out to roughly $3,000 at public rates.

Minimum cost for SSO: Custom pricing; likely $3,000+/year.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Custom pricing; likely $3,000+/year.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: Yes

• AI phone screening: Yes

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: No

• Personality tests: Yes

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: Yes

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: HireQuotient has moved beyond assessments into an AI-native recruiting operating system. Its agents can source candidates, verify credentials, screen profiles, conduct outreach across channels, administer assessments, and automate interview workflows. The current platform is particularly focused on healthcare, insurance, construction, manufacturing, and other frontline industries.

Notable limitations: Customers want more customization around tags, reports, workflow stages, and analytics. The product is also evolving quickly, so its current positioning is much broader than the assessment product that originally placed it in G2's Technical Skills Screening category. Multiple G2 reviews from April 2026 mention those customization requests.

—

HiPeople

Website: hipeople.io
Company size: 11–100
G2 reviews: 401+
Notable clients: Zapier, Grammarly, Superhuman, DAZN, OLX

Trial: Free usage available for one candidate rather than a conventional timed trial. The free experience is intended to let teams test the product before buying.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Approximately $720–$2,000+/year, depending on how many credits each candidate consumes. HiPeople now charges credits based on the specific screening or assessment actions completed; a short assessment with additional question types can consume materially more credits than a basic workflow.

Minimum cost for SSO: Enterprise pricing; exact price not disclosed. SSO is restricted to Enterprise.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Approximately $1,008+/year. Its Scale assessment pricing has been published from about $84/month with integrations included.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: Yes

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: No

• Personality tests: Yes

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: Yes

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: HiPeople combines AI resume screening, assessments, interviews, and automated reference checks. Its assessment library spans hard skills, cognitive ability, personality, culture, and technical skills, while its reference-checking workflow is deeper than most products in this category.

Notable limitations: Customers say customization can be restrictive, particularly for specialized roles, and some want more detailed or configurable assessment information. The credit model has also become less straightforward as more AI actions and question types consume different amounts. G2 lists more than 1,000 reviews, including reviews from March 2026.

—

Bryq

Website: bryq.com
Company size: 11–100
G2 reviews: 11–100
Notable clients: Granicus, RoadRunner, Hawk-Eye Innovations, Tripledot, Metro Pacific Tollways

Trial: No self-serve timed trial is currently advertised. Bryq offers a demo and encourages buyers to test the platform against an open role before committing.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: $828/year. Bryq Pro includes unlimited invitations for direct/internal recruiting.

Minimum cost for SSO: $828/year plus an SSO add-on; add-on price not publicly disclosed.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: $828/year. Self-service ATS integrations are included with Pro.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: No

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: No

• Personality tests: Yes

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: Yes

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: Bryq combines cognitive ability, personality, hard skills, culture fit, and AI fluency into a single candidate profile. Unlike most credit-based products, its Pro tier currently includes unlimited candidate invitations for direct hiring, making the economics unusually favorable at higher volume.

Notable limitations: Customers sometimes want more qualitative explanation behind results and more personalized candidate feedback. Some also report occasional integration friction. G2 includes multiple reviews from February and March 2026.

—

Cangrade

Website: cangrade.com
Company size: 11–100
G2 reviews: 11–100
Notable clients: Wayfair, FDNY, JBS, MarketStar, Lamar Advertising

Trial: 30 days. Cangrade's Jules AI Copilot trial includes Resume Screen, Talent Assessment, and Structured Interviews. It is limited to three roles per AI agent and currently requires using one of a specified set of supported ATS platforms.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Approximately $5,000–$15,000/year. Cangrade uses custom subscription pricing and targets mid-market and enterprise organizations.

Minimum cost for SSO: Custom pricing; approximately $5,000–$15,000+/year.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Custom pricing; approximately $5,000–$15,000+/year.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: Yes

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: No

• Personality tests: Yes

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: No

• SOC 2 compliance: Yes

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: Cangrade is built around predictive hiring rather than coding assessment. It combines AI resume screening with hard-skills assessments, more than 50 personality traits, structured interview guidance, custom success models, and post-hire talent intelligence. Its AI can generate role-specific assessments from job requirements while explaining the scoring logic.

Notable limitations: Customers say integrations can occasionally be challenging, some assessment wording can be confusing to candidates, and results are not always instantaneous. The product is also much less focused on developer-specific environments than coding-first competitors. G2 has several April 2026 reviews.

—

Maki

Website: makipeople.com
Company size: 101+
G2 reviews: 101–400
Notable clients: H&M, PwC, Amazon, Nestlé, Sephora

Trial: No standardized self-serve trial is publicly disclosed. Maki is primarily sold through demos and enterprise pilots.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Approximately $5,000–$15,000/year. Maki uses custom enterprise pricing, so candidate-volume pricing is not publicly available.

Minimum cost for SSO: Custom pricing; approximately $5,000–$15,000+/year.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Custom pricing; approximately $5,000–$15,000+/year.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: Yes

• AI phone screening: Yes

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: No

• Personality tests: Yes

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: Yes

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: Maki has evolved into an agentic recruiting platform that runs workflows on top of an employer's ATS. It combines candidate screening, conversational AI, technical and cognitive assessments, language tests, personality and behavioral evaluation, and automated recruiting agents designed to move candidates through the funnel with minimal recruiter intervention.

Notable limitations: Customers say reporting could be more flexible, niche assessments sometimes need more customization, and candidates occasionally encounter technical glitches or lockouts. A February 2026 G2 reviewer specifically praised the anti-fraud functionality while mentioning occasional technical issues.

—

AssessFirst

Website: assessfirst.com
Company size: 101+
G2 reviews: 101–400
Notable clients: Public customer logos are extensive, but I would verify the five brands individually before publishing rather than infer them from undated marketing assets.

Trial: No standard self-serve assessment trial is clearly published. AssessFirst uses demos and guided evaluation; its VOICE product and enterprise plans are sales-led.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: At least €7,080/year based on the publicly listed Web plan at €590/month. That plan supports up to 100 candidates per month, so 300 annual candidates fall within the published capacity.

Minimum cost for SSO: Likely €7,080+/year; exact SSO packaging is not publicly disclosed.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Approximately €7,080+/year. API capabilities are included in the published Web offering, while deeper automation is available in higher custom tiers.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: No

• AI phone screening: Yes

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: No

• Personality tests: Yes

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: No

• SOC 2 compliance: No

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: AssessFirst is centered on predictive talent intelligence. It evaluates personality, motivation, cognitive ability, job fit, management compatibility, and potential rather than focusing narrowly on technical skills. Its newer VOICE product uses conversational AI to evaluate technical knowledge and language ability through spoken responses and can produce structured scoring in minutes.

Notable limitations: Customers say some assessments feel repetitive or overly long, certain behavioral descriptions can feel too rigid, and candidates sometimes want clearer explanations of how results should be interpreted. G2 has numerous reviews from 2026, including reviews as recent as August.

—

Talview

Website: talview.com
Company size: 101+
G2 reviews: 101–400
Notable clients: Best Buy, NVIDIA, Meta, Cisco, Shopify

Trial: Product walkthrough and pilot available. Talview does not offer a conventional self-serve trial. Pilot usage beyond 10 candidates may incur charges, and the minimum commercial commitment is generally around 150–200 candidates.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Approximately $5,000–$15,000/year. Talview uses unit-based custom pricing, and the total depends on which assessment, interview, and proctoring products are used.

Minimum cost for SSO: Custom pricing; approximately $5,000–$15,000+/year.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Custom pricing; approximately $5,000–$15,000+/year.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: No

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: Yes

• Personality tests: Yes

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: Yes

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: Talview is particularly strong in high-stakes interviewing and proctoring. Its current platform includes an agentic AI interviewer and agentic AI proctor, candidate identity verification, behavioral monitoring, secure testing environments, live and automated proctoring, assessments, and video interviewing.

Notable limitations: Customers say integrations and candidate follow-up can sometimes require more manual work than expected, while learners occasionally encounter login or setup friction. The platform is also designed primarily for larger organizations, so pricing and implementation are less straightforward than self-serve products.

—

PMaps

Website: pmaps.in
Company size: 11–100
G2 reviews: 11–100
Notable clients: TaskUs, Teleperformance, Firstsource

Trial: Demo or trial available; exact duration and candidate limit are not publicly disclosed.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Approximately $1,000–$4,000/year. PMaps uses custom pricing based on assessment volume and the types of tests required.

Minimum cost for SSO: Custom pricing; exact price not disclosed.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Custom pricing; exact price not disclosed.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: No

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: No

• Personality tests: Yes

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: No

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: PMaps is more focused on behavioral, cognitive, communication, and role-fit assessments than developer-specific hiring. It is especially oriented toward high-volume frontline hiring and supports hundreds of job-role assessments with visual and language-light testing formats.

Notable limitations: Customers say report sharing can still involve too much manual work, report generation can occasionally be slow, and recruiters would benefit from more automated candidate communication.

—

Sapia.ai

Website: sapia.ai
Company size: 101+
G2 reviews: 11–100
Notable clients: Qantas, London Gatwick, Starbucks, Holland & Barrett, Joe & The Juice

Trial: No public self-serve trial. Sapia.ai uses demos and enterprise pilots rather than a fixed-duration free trial.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Approximately $10,000–$30,000/year. Pricing is custom and generally geared toward high-volume enterprise hiring.

Minimum cost for SSO: Custom pricing; approximately $10,000+/year.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Custom pricing; approximately $10,000+/year.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: No

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: No

• Live interviews: No

• Personality tests: Yes

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: No

• SOC 2 compliance: Yes

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: Sapia.ai takes a very different approach from coding-assessment vendors. Its conversational AI interviews candidates at scale and generates behavioral and job-fit insights from their responses, with an emphasis on explainability, fairness, and candidate experience.

Notable limitations: Customers say automated scoring can occasionally feel inconsistent or fail to reflect a candidate’s abilities accurately. The platform is also poorly suited to teams that specifically need hands-on technical coding exercises or collaborative technical interviews.

—

AI Interviewer

Website: aiinterviewer.com
Company size: 11–100
G2 reviews: 11–100
Notable clients: Not prominently disclosed publicly

Trial: Free access available. Exact trial limits are not consistently published.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Approximately $300–$900/year. Current customer feedback references pricing around $1 per AI interview, with higher costs possible depending on interview length and functionality.

Minimum cost for SSO: Not publicly disclosed.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Not currently available publicly.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: Yes

• AI phone screening: Yes

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: No

• Personality tests: No

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: No

• SSO: No

• ATS integrations: No

Notable features: AI Interviewer combines resume screening, voice and video interviewing, coding assessments, adaptive follow-up questions, and fraud detection at a relatively low per-interview price. Interviews can dynamically probe candidates based on previous answers rather than following only a static questionnaire.

Notable limitations: Customers say AI interviews can feel impersonal, evaluation criteria are not always sufficiently transparent, multilingual scoring quality can vary, and integrations remain limited.

—

Xobin

Website: xobin.com
Company size: 11–100
G2 reviews: 101–400
Notable clients: Toyota, Dell Technologies, Ericsson, Randstad, Reliance Retail

Trial: Limited-time free trial after a demo. Xobin does not publicly specify a standard duration or candidate allowance.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Approximately $1,500–$5,000/year. Xobin offers both pay-per-candidate and subscription pricing, with the actual price depending on volume and modules used.

Minimum cost for SSO: Custom pricing; approximately $1,500–$5,000+/year.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Custom pricing; approximately $1,500–$5,000+/year.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: Yes

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: Yes

• Personality tests: Yes

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: Yes

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: Xobin is a broad talent assessment platform with technical and nontechnical tests, psychometric assessments, video interviewing, candidate tracking, AI grading, large-scale campus hiring, and a very large question library.

Notable limitations: Customers say reporting could be more polished, integration options could be broader, and advanced proctoring and customization still have room for improvement.

—

Interviewer.AI

Website: interviewer.ai
Company size: 11–100
G2 reviews: 11–100
Notable clients: AIA, YES Bank, Axis Bank

Trial: 14 days. The trial supports up to 5 candidate assessments, 4 users, and up to 10 live interview setups.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Approximately $1,700–$2,400/year. The $199/month Essential plan includes 50 interview credits per month, which is sufficient for 300 annual candidates. Annual billing is discounted.

Minimum cost for SSO: Enterprise pricing; exact price not disclosed.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Approximately $2,400+/year, depending on the integration and plan.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: Yes

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: Yes

• Personality tests: No

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: No

• SOC 2 compliance: Yes

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: Interviewer.AI combines AI resume scoring, asynchronous video interviews, response-relevancy scoring, candidate matching, and human review. Its product is especially focused on efficiently reducing large applicant pools before recruiters conduct live interviews.

Notable limitations: Customers say automated scoring can sometimes be inaccurate, answer-time limits can feel restrictive, and video scoring should not always be treated as a substitute for human judgment.

—

InterviewVector

Website: interviewvector.com
Company size: 11–100
G2 reviews: 11–100
Notable clients: Walmart, Flipkart, Swiggy, Zepto, Mindtickle

Trial: Trial available; duration and pricing are determined with the customer. InterviewVector’s terms explicitly allow trial access but do not publish a standard duration or free-candidate allowance.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Approximately $5,000–$15,000+/year. Pricing is subscription and service based, with interviews often performed by InterviewVector’s external technical interviewers.

Minimum cost for SSO: Custom pricing; approximately $5,000–$15,000+/year.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Custom pricing; approximately $5,000–$15,000+/year.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: No

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: Yes

• Personality tests: No

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: Yes

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: InterviewVector is fundamentally an interview-as-a-service business. Companies can outsource technical interviews to experienced interviewers while also using QuickScreen for asynchronous assessments. Interviews are recorded, structured using predefined guides, and returned with detailed feedback.

Notable limitations: Customers say the service can become expensive when hiring budgets are tight, onboarding could be faster, and the subscription model is less attractive for companies that only interview occasionally.

—

CodeInterview

Website: codeinterview.io
Company size: 1–10
G2 reviews: 11–100
Notable clients: AT&T, Workday, Redis, OpenGov, Luxoft

Trial: 14 days. No credit card is required. A free plan also includes 2 interviews per month.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Approximately $888/year. Pro costs $49/month and covers 240 annual interviews; another 60 interviews at $5 each brings the annual total to roughly $888.

Minimum cost for SSO: More than $588/year; exact enterprise price not disclosed. SAML SSO requires Enterprise.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: More than $588/year; exact enterprise price not disclosed. API access requires Enterprise.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: No

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: No

• Live interviews: Yes

• Personality tests: No

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: No

• SOC 2 compliance: No

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: CodeInterview is intentionally narrow: it provides a collaborative coding environment with real-time execution, multiple programming languages, video calling, and interview playback. Its pay-as-you-go pricing also makes it accessible to teams that only conduct occasional technical interviews.

Notable limitations: Customers say latency can interfere with collaborative editing, terminal output could be easier to read, and parts of the interface feel less polished than newer technical interviewing products.

—

SkillRobo

Website: skillrobo.com
Company size: 11–100
G2 reviews: 1–10
Notable clients: Not prominently disclosed publicly

Trial: 14 days. No credit card is required and SkillRobo says the trial provides full feature access.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: $490/year. The annual Happy plan includes 360 invitations.

Minimum cost for SSO: Not publicly disclosed.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Not publicly disclosed.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: No

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: No

• Personality tests: Yes

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: No

• SSO: No

• ATS integrations: No

Notable features: SkillRobo competes aggressively on price while supporting technical and nontechnical assessments, AI-generated questions, automated scoring, custom tests, role-based libraries, anti-cheating controls, and live proctoring on higher tiers.

Notable limitations: Customers say customization could be deeper and some functionality feels limited compared with larger assessment suites. Its enterprise ecosystem—particularly integrations, SSO, and security certifications—is also much less developed.

—

Evalart

Website: evalart.com
Company size: 1–10
G2 reviews: 11–100
Notable clients: Adecco, Accenture, Capgemini, Bancolombia, Enel

Trial: No time limit stated. The free plan allows up to 5 candidates, requires no credit card, and includes the same assessments and anti-fraud functionality as paid plans.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Approximately $900–$1,100/year. A 50-candidate credit pack currently costs $190, so six packs would cost $1,140 before promotional discounts; subscription pricing can reduce the effective cost.

Minimum cost for SSO: Not publicly disclosed.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Not publicly disclosed.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: No

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: No

• Personality tests: Yes

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: No

• SSO: No

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: Evalart combines programming tests with psychometric, aptitude, language, knowledge, and industry assessments. Its pricing is candidate-based rather than test-based, meaning a candidate can complete multiple assessments while consuming a single credit. Webcam monitoring, identity checks, and suspicious-behavior detection are included.

Notable limitations: Customers say candidate comparison could be stronger, reports could be more visual, and some technical tests need more difficult or updated questions.

—

TestDome

Website: testdome.com
Company size: 11–100
G2 reviews: 101–400
Notable clients: Adobe, PayPal, EY, McAfee, Indeed

Trial: 14 days. TestDome offers a free trial; its public site does not clearly state a candidate limit for the trial.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: $2,400/year. TestDome sells a 300-candidate pack at $8 per candidate with no subscription required.

Minimum cost for SSO: Not publicly disclosed. SSO is offered as an enterprise capability.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Not publicly disclosed. ATS integrations are offered as an enterprise capability.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: No

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: Yes

• Personality tests: No

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: No

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: TestDome uses straightforward prepaid pricing rather than annual subscriptions or complicated credit systems. Its library covers technical and nontechnical skills, while every plan includes webcam and screen proctoring, AI-cheating detection, automated scoring, and collaborative live interviews.

Notable limitations: Customers say timed tests do not always reflect real-world job performance, pricing can become expensive for smaller teams, and some invitation emails end up in spam. Others say portions of the question library can be too US-centric.

—

Peoplebox.ai

Website: peoplebox.ai
Company size: 11–100
G2 reviews: 101–400
Notable clients: Razorpay, Whatfix, RedBus, Exotel, HackerRank

Trial: No standardized employer trial is publicly advertised. Nova is evaluated through a tailored demo and sales process rather than a fixed-duration self-serve trial.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Approximately $5,000–$15,000/year. Nova uses custom pricing based on resume volume, interview volume, and the hiring workflow.

Minimum cost for SSO: Custom pricing; approximately $5,000–$15,000+/year.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Custom pricing; approximately $5,000–$15,000+/year.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: Yes

• AI phone screening: Yes

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: No

• Personality tests: No

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: Yes

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: Nova is positioned as an AI hiring teammate rather than just an assessment platform. It can screen resumes, conduct pre-screening calls and conversational first-round interviews, administer coding rounds, and apply advanced proctoring. That hiring functionality sits alongside Peoplebox’s broader performance and talent-management platform.

Notable limitations: Customers say initial configuration and calibration can require trial and error, while the broader Peoplebox interface has a learning curve and some areas could offer more customization. One 2026 reviewer specifically called out the calibration required when setting up AI interview questions.

—

Jobma

Website: jobma.com
Company size: 101+
G2 reviews: 101–400
Notable clients: Samsung, Mayo Clinic, Schneider Electric, MIT, Wargaming

Trial: Free trial available. Jobma does not publicly disclose a standardized duration or candidate allowance.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Approximately $3,000–$10,000/year. All employer plans are quote-based, with pricing depending on candidate volume, integrations, and functionality.

Minimum cost for SSO: Custom pricing; approximately $3,000–$10,000+/year.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Custom pricing; approximately $3,000–$10,000+/year.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: Yes

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: Yes

• Personality tests: No

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: Yes

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: Jobma combines one-way and live video interviews with autonomous AI video interviews, technical and skills assessments, AI resume screening, AI scoring, and both automated and human proctoring. Its security program includes SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certification.

Notable limitations: Customers say occasional technical issues can interrupt interviews, while candidate-management workflows and access controls could be smoother. Some functionality is also gated into higher custom-priced tiers, making total cost difficult to determine before speaking with sales.

—

Intervue

Website: intervue.io
Company size: 101+
G2 reviews: 11–100
Notable clients: Adobe, BP, S&P Global, Rakuten, Nykaa

Trial: Trial available. Intervue customizes trial access based on expected hiring volume and requirements rather than publishing a fixed duration or candidate allowance.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Approximately $5,000–$15,000+/year. Pricing depends heavily on whether a company uses automated assessments, AI screening, or Intervue’s outsourced expert interviewers.

Minimum cost for SSO: Custom pricing; approximately $5,000–$15,000+/year.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Custom pricing; approximately $5,000–$15,000+/year.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: No

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: Yes

• Personality tests: No

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: Yes

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: Intervue’s main differentiator is interview outsourcing. Companies can send candidates to a network of technical interviewers who conduct and score live interviews in a proctored coding environment. The platform also includes automated technical assessments and AI screening for earlier stages of the funnel.

Notable limitations: Customers say scheduling should be more flexible and that interviewer consistency can vary. Because the core service can involve paying external experts to interview candidates, it also operates more like a managed service than a conventional self-serve assessment product.

—

iScalePro

Website: iscalepro.com
Company size: 1–10
G2 reviews: 11–100
Notable clients: Public customer references are limited

Trial: No standardized self-serve trial is publicly advertised. Prospective customers can request a demo.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Approximately ₹15,000–₹30,000/year. Skill assessments are advertised from ₹50 per candidate, while the pricing calculator and FAQ reference ₹100 credits; volume discounts can apply.

Minimum cost for SSO: Not publicly disclosed.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Not publicly disclosed.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: No

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: No

• Personality tests: Yes

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: No

• SSO: No

• ATS integrations: No

Notable features: iScalePro competes aggressively on price and combines coding and role-specific skills tests with DISC and OCEAN-based psychometric assessments. Advanced proctoring can monitor the webcam, microphone, screen activity, tab changes, and potential use of tools such as ChatGPT.

Notable limitations: Customers want more customization, stronger integrations, and broader language support. The platform is also much earlier in its enterprise maturity than larger competitors, particularly around SSO, integrations, and administrative infrastructure.

—

Sova

Website: sovaassessment.com
Company size: 11–100
G2 reviews: 11–100
Notable clients: Sky, Vodafone, TUI, Nationwide, John Lewis Partnership

Trial: No public self-serve trial. Sova uses demonstrations and sales-led evaluations rather than publishing a fixed free-trial duration.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: £28,600 for the first year. The All-In-One Core plan starts at £2,000/month billed annually with unlimited candidates, plus a required £4,600 onboarding fee. Subsequent years start at £24,000.

Minimum cost for SSO: Custom pricing; more than £28,600 for the first year if an Advanced plan is required.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: £28,600 for the first year. Standard ATS library integration is included with Core.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: No

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: Yes

• Personality tests: Yes

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: No

• SOC 2 compliance: No

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: Sova is built around assessment science and complex enterprise hiring rather than developer testing alone. It combines cognitive, personality, situational-judgment and work-sample assessments with one-way and two-way video interviews and virtual assessment centers. Its pricing also allows unlimited candidates, subject to fair-use provisions.

Notable limitations: Customers say reporting and analytics could be deeper, some administrative workflows are not as intuitive as they should be, and translations can require refinement. The required onboarding fee also makes the entry cost materially higher than the advertised monthly subscription alone.

—

LuGo-Test

Website: lugo-test.com
Company size: 1–10
G2 reviews: 11–100
Notable clients: Amdocs, Verint, SolarEdge, Rafael, National Instruments

Trial: Free trial available. The trial lets an employer create one assessment, send unlimited invitations, and view results for up to 5 candidates.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: $1,800/year. Pro costs $150/month and includes 40 test credits per month, or 480 annually.

Minimum cost for SSO: Not publicly disclosed.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: $1,800/year. ATS integration is included with Pro.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: No

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: Yes

• Personality tests: No

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: No

• SSO: No

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: LuGo-Test is a technical-focused assessment platform with a relatively straightforward price point. It supports coding challenges, technical tests, live coding, custom assessments, and AI-powered proctoring that monitors screenshots, webcam activity, tab switching, and unauthorized AI tools.

Notable limitations: Customers mention occasional freezing and other technical issues, while subscription limits and ATS workflow automation could be more flexible. Its security and enterprise-administration offering is also thinner than larger competitors.

—

InterWiz AI

Website: interwiz.ai
Company size: 1–10
G2 reviews: 1–10
Notable clients: Sybrid, Emumba, DvSum

Trial: Free trial available. No credit card is required and InterWiz describes it as providing complete access; a fixed duration or usage limit is not publicly stated.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: $1,200–$3,000/year. Screening interviews cost $4 each and in-depth interviews cost $10 each, so 300 interviews cost between $1,200 and $3,000 depending on the format.

Minimum cost for SSO: Not publicly disclosed.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Not publicly disclosed.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: Yes

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: Yes

• Personality tests: Yes

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: No

• SSO: No

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: InterWiz has unusually transparent usage-based pricing. It charges $0.20 per CV evaluation, $4 for a screening interview, and $10 for an in-depth interview. The product supports AI-led conversational interviews, practical and analytical assessments, personality insights, coding challenges, proctoring, transcripts, and detailed recommendations.

Notable limitations: The platform is very young and has a small customer and review footprint. Enterprise functionality around identity management, integrations, and security certification is also less mature than established competitors.

—

Unstop

Website: unstop.com
Company size: 101+
G2 reviews: 11–100
Notable clients: Amazon, PepsiCo, L'Oréal, Accenture, Uber

Trial: No standardized self-serve employer trial is publicly advertised. Employers generally engage Unstop for hiring campaigns, assessments, competitions, or broader talent programs.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Approximately $1,000–$5,000/year. Employer pricing is custom and varies based on assessment type, candidate volume, proctoring, and whether sourcing or employer-branding services are included.

Minimum cost for SSO: Custom pricing; exact price not disclosed.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Custom pricing; exact price not disclosed.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: No

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: No

• Personality tests: Yes

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: No

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: Unstop is as much a talent marketplace and campus-recruiting network as an assessment platform. Employers can source and engage early-career talent, run competitions and hackathons, and administer coding, aptitude, communication, personality, and other assessments with AI-powered proctoring.

Notable limitations: Customers say the platform can lag during larger competitions or assessments and that some workflows could be more intuitive. It is also difficult to compare directly with pure assessment software because sourcing, employer branding, competitions, and community access are central parts of the offering.

—

ASTRNT

Website: astrnt.co
Company size: 11–100
G2 reviews: 11–100
Notable clients: Public customer references are limited

Trial: No time limit on the free plan. Organizations can assess up to 5 people per month using ASTRNT’s core functionality without approvals or a paid subscription.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Custom pricing. The free plan only covers 60 assessments annually; the Enterprise plan required for 300 candidates does not have public pricing.

Minimum cost for SSO: Custom pricing; exact price not disclosed.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Custom pricing; exact price not disclosed.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: No

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: No

• Personality tests: Yes

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: No

• SOC 2 compliance: No

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: ASTRNT combines structured asynchronous video interviewing with behavioral, situational, and technical skills assessments. Its free plan is unusually usable for very small teams, while automated scoring evaluates communication, delivery, fit, and assessment performance without requiring recruiters to review every response manually.

Notable limitations: Customers say occasional technical errors can interrupt the experience and that AI-led evaluation can feel impersonal compared with a conventional interview. Enterprise pricing is also completely opaque once a company exceeds the five-candidate-per-month free allowance.

—

WeCP

Website: wecreateproblems.com
Company size: 11–100
G2 reviews: 11–100
Notable clients: Microsoft, Robert Bosch, Infosys, Texas Instruments, Mindtree

Trial: Free trial available. WeCP provides trial access to the assessment platform, but a standardized duration and candidate allowance are not clearly disclosed publicly.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Approximately $2,000–$6,000/year. WeCP uses volume-based pricing, so the actual cost depends on candidate volume, assessment configuration, and enterprise functionality.

Minimum cost for SSO: Custom pricing; approximately $2,000–$6,000+/year.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Custom pricing; approximately $2,000–$6,000+/year.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: Yes

• AI phone screening: Yes

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: Yes

• Personality tests: Yes

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: Yes

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: WeCP combines technical and nontechnical assessments with coding challenges, communication evaluations, AI-powered screening, live interviewing, and automated proctoring. It is particularly oriented toward high-volume technical hiring and lets employers customize assessments around specific skills rather than relying entirely on predefined tests. G2 currently lists 84 reviews and categorizes 79 of them under Technical Skills Screening.

Notable limitations: Customers say occasional technical errors can disrupt assessments, while pricing and email notifications could be improved. The platform also has a smaller ecosystem and brand footprint than the largest technical assessment vendors.

—

Karat

Website: karat.com
Company size: 101+
G2 reviews: 11–100
Notable clients: Indeed, Roblox, Compass, Wayfair, Intuit

Trial: No public self-serve trial. Karat uses a sales-led evaluation and pilot process because its core offering includes human technical interviewers rather than simply providing assessment software.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Approximately $30,000–$100,000+/year. Karat is fundamentally an interview-as-a-service product, so pricing depends on interview volume, role complexity, interviewer services, and the broader hiring program.

Minimum cost for SSO: Custom pricing; likely within an enterprise agreement.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Custom pricing; likely within an enterprise agreement.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: No

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: Yes

• Personality tests: No

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: No

• SOC 2 compliance: Yes

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: Karat is different from almost every assessment vendor because companies can outsource technical interviews rather than simply buy the software used to conduct them. Professional interviewers conduct structured technical interviews, score candidates against consistent rubrics, and return hiring signals to the employer. This makes it particularly useful for high-volume engineering hiring when internal engineers would otherwise spend significant time interviewing. G2 currently places Karat directly in its Technical Skills Screening category.

Notable limitations: Customers say some questions prioritize solving problems quickly rather than optimizing solutions, while candidates can find certain questions time-consuming to understand. Using third-party interviewers can also make the candidate experience feel less connected to the company actually doing the hiring.

—

Otomeyt AI

Website: otomeyt.ai
Company size: 101+
G2 reviews: 11–100
Notable clients: Deloitte, IDFC FIRST Bank

Trial: Demo or pilot available. Otomeyt does not publish a standardized self-serve trial duration or candidate allowance.

Minimum cost for 300 invites/year: Approximately $3,000–$10,000/year. Pricing is quote-based and depends on candidate volume, assessment types, proctoring, and other modules.

Minimum cost for SSO: Custom pricing; approximately $3,000–$10,000+/year.

Minimum cost for ATS integration: Custom pricing; approximately $3,000–$10,000+/year.

Capabilities:

• Resume grading: Yes

• AI phone screening: No

• Take-home tests: Yes

• Live interviews: Yes

• Personality tests: Yes

• VS Code with agentic coding: No

• Webcam proctoring: Yes

• SOC 2 compliance: Yes

• SSO: Yes

• ATS integrations: Yes

Notable features: Otomeyt AI has shifted toward AI-generated, role-specific assessments rather than relying exclusively on a static question library. Its MeritEdge assessment engine can generate technical questions from a job description, evaluate candidate submissions with AI, support coding and behavioral assessments, and produce structured reports and benchmarking data. G2 currently lists 45 reviews, with 44 categorized under Technical Skills Screening.

Notable limitations: Customers say customization could be stronger and that reporting still needs improvement for some assessment types. Others say rapidly evolving workflows can create ambiguity and would benefit from better documentation and more structured processes. These issues appear in reviews posted in February 2026.